Friday, March 4, 2011

Is Michael Jordan Really The Best Ever?

Warning: This post may be blasphemous to some.

I know this doesn't relate to Philadelphia sports specifically, but it's something I've thought about for a while and want to write about. Most major sports have their player who is considered the best to ever play the sport. In hockey, it's Wayne Gretzky. I think this is the most clear cut case out of the four major sports. He holds records that will never be broken. 92 goals in a single season. 163 assists in a single season. In fact, he holds 10 of the top 11 highest single season assist totals. I could go on and on, listing his records and career rankings.

In baseball, it's Babe Ruth. Though a lot of his records have been broken, I still believe he is the best ever. He hit 714 career home runs, a record that stood for almost 40 years, and is still good for third all time. He still holds the records for highest career slugging percentage and OPS. And he is second all time in RBI's, on base percentage, and home runs per at bat. To top it all off, in the 148 games he started as a pitcher he won 94 of them with a career ERA of 2.28.

Football doesn't lend itself to this kind of conversation. Each skill position would have to be analyzed separately. My best skill position players would go like this: WR: Jerry Rice (not even a close second here), QB: Joe Montana, RB: Walter Payton.

In basketball, it's Michael Jordan, right? I'm not sure I agree with this one. At the very least, it's not as clear cut as it is in the other major sports. I'm not saying he isn't one of the best ever. I just don't think he is the unanimous, no-brainer, number one that many people consider him to be. Jordan does hold a lot of NBA records, including most career points per game at 30.1 and most MVP's. But I think that the real reason he is considered the greatest is twofold.

1. He played in an era when the NBA was at it's peak popularity. The dream team crushed the Olympics, Magic vs. Bird was in full swing and the dunk contests were epic (Wilkens vs. Jordan, Spud Webb, etc.). Within that era of basketball, Jordan was the best player. He won 6 championships and led the Bulls to an NBA record 72 wins in 1996. He was the face of the NBA in a time when the NBA was much more than it is now.

2. He changed the NBA in numerous ways. He paved the way for players to be more popular and recognizable than their team. He was the first player to really market himself as a brand. He became an international phenomenon because of his shoe, cereal and other apparel deals. The "I wanna be like Mike" commercials were wildly popular. His sneakers were coveted by any young basketball player wanting to play like Mike. He opened the door for players like Iverson, Kobe, Shaq and Lebron to really market themselves and to make their own brand outside of their NBA team. However, none of this is related to his play on the court. Though I think this is in the back of people's minds when they consider Jordan to be one of the greatest.

I think the case for the greatest player to ever play basketball is better made for Wilt Chamberlain or Bill Russell. Personally, I think Wilt is the best player of all time. He's second to Jordan in career points per game by only .05 points per game. Though he is second to Jordan, he holds 5 of the top 6 highest point per game averages for a single season, ever. In the 1961-62 season her averaged 50.3 points per game (PPG), a record that will never be broken (I know in sports you can never say never, but I think it's safe to use it here). Not even his 44.8 PPG in the 62-63 season will be touched. Another record of his that won't be touched: scoring 100 points and grabbing 55 rebounds in a single game (separate games). Wilt also holds the records for career rebounds per game at 22.9 and total rebounds. Though blocked shots weren't tracked when Wilt was playing, it is largely considered that he would hold that record as well. One game his coach asked the score keeper to keep track of the shots Wilt blocked, he counted 25. He even finished in the top seven in assists per game in four different seasons. In total, he holds 72 NBA records.

All of this is really impressive, but how his play forced the NBA to make rule changes is the thing that astounds me most. The NBA widened the lane to keep him further away from the basket and hopefully less able to dominate games. The NBA instituted offensive goal tending and changed rules regarding inbounding the ball, all as a direct result of Wilt. The funniest, and most fascinating, rule change was the rule that was created governing how free throws can be shot. Wilt reportedly had a 50 inch vertical leap, he was literally able to convert foul shots via a slam dunk without a running start. He completely undermined the difficulty of the shot. Now, you can't cross the line when shooting a free throw.

I'd be remiss if I didn't recognize his "achievements" off the field. Wilt claimed to have slept with over 20,000 women, though I won't use this in my argument.

I think the knock on Wilt is that he only won two NBA titles. This was due to the fact that the Bill Russell's Boston Celtics were busy winning 11 titles and consistently knocking Wilt out of the playoffs. I don't factor championships into the best player discussion as much as other people do. These are team games, so many factors go into winning a championship that are beyond any one players control.

The best player to ever play a sport is really a matter of opinion. It's my opinion that Jordan isn't the best player that every played basketball, like most people consider him to be.

6 comments:

  1. 3. He starred in the critically acclaimed, award-winning movie "Space Jam".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very good point. After all, without him the Monstars would have beaten the Looney Tunes team. Possibly his greatest career achievement.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think it's tough to measure a shooting guard vs. a center because of the dynamics of a team, the way the game is played at that certain time, and the fact that a center has different talents than a shooting guard has. It's almost like you have to split them up as position player like the NFL because in reality the only really comparable statistics are points per game (sure, you can argue assists, steals, etc, but given what each players role is, it might be skewed a bit). Its hard to argue that the Bulls 6 titles that they accrued with Jordan (especially seeing what happened when he wasn't on the team for the 2 years in between) doesn't fight for the fact Jordan was amazing. I feel like you'd be comparing apples to oranges when comparing Jordan to Chamberlain (or to Russell etc.).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your right, center is very different than the other 4 positions. So I guess they shouldn't be compared against each other. But if you compare Wilt to any other center and Jordan to any other guard, the gap between #1 and #2 is very different. I think the gap between Magic (or Bird) and Jordan isn't that big. But the gap between Wilt and say Russell or Kareem is huge, at least I think it is. Statistically, no other center ever came close to doing what Wilt did (I know Kareem is the all time points lead, but his career PPG is only 16th all time, his career was just so long that he amassed so many points). Russell did win 11 championships, but he had other players on his teams like Bob Cousy and John Havlicek and possibly the greatest coach ever in Red Auerbach. His individual numbers aren't eye popping like Wilt's.

    And Jordan's Bulls did reach the Eastern Conference finals in the two years he was "retired". They did have another hall of famer on the team in Scottie Pippen. I'm not saying Jordan isn't a top 3 player ever. He is probably the best guard ever. I just don't think he should be considered the Babe Ruth of basketball, like many consider him to be.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Bill Simmons book I was talking about the other day spends a lot of pages on this topic, ranking the top 90 or so players ever. Before breaking into the top players though, he compares Wilt vs. Russell at length, and as expected from a Boston guy chooses Russell as the better player. That said, his reasons were pretty compelling. I think the gist of the main point was just that the object of the game is to win titles, so the best player is the player who most advances his team's prospects of putting rings on their fingers, and this was clearly Russell's expertise.

    One of the other interesting points compared the supporting cast of Russell vs. that of Wilt's and at least partially argued that a major reason Cousy/Havlicek/etc. are held in such high regard is because of their titles earned in large part because of Russell. While undoubtedly great players, they are comparable to Wilt's supporting cast (Nate Thurmond, Hal Greer, Jerry West, etc.), if not worse, so the enormous championship gap of 11-2 is significant.

    I still might agree with you that it's hard to go against Wilt's numbers, but I'll bring the book around so you can take a look at it. Aside from that, I still find it tough to put MJ anywhere but #1. Also, I think I still hold Ruth as the overall #1 because if you compare what he did against his peers, nothing in any other sport is even remotely close. Gretzky's numbers are cartoonish, but compare Ruth's just to players pre 1950 or so, and it's insane.

    ReplyDelete
  6. #99 is one of the few players that can be compared to his previous and future generations. His numbers are cartoonish but he was that good. The game of hockey hasn't changed all that much besides adding helmets and taking away the two lined pass, so he can be compared to everyone that has ever played. He has both the titles and stats, the stats which no one can match, not even Cindy Crosby. As far as Jordan vs Wilt, etc, once Kobe's career is over, can you throw him in the mix as one of the greatest near the top? I think you have to, he's won championships with far less than Jordan ever had, not discounting MJ, I just think Kobe is grossly underrated when talking about this stuff

    ReplyDelete